Editor’s Note: Here’s another archival post worth revisiting. Enjoy!
I recently spoke with a nice woman who works in publishing. I asked her why publishing has abandoned timelessness in favor of timeliness.
I will summarize her answer:
Librarians used to drive the market. That explains the success of Robert Lawson, Eleanor Estes, and Richard and Florence Atwater. Librarians measure current works according to the yardstick of the classics. However, librarians are no longer the market driving force they once were. Today the market is driven by moms. Moms overwhelmingly prefer timeliness, which has made celebrity publishing a thing. Moms have single-handedly qualified Madonna, Molly Shannon, Perez Hilton, Katie Couric, Jewel, and Tyra Banks to be children’s authors.
In all fairness to Tyra Banks, it’s quite possible that Modelland (snicker) will be a classic of young adult fiction. Still, it seems plausible to cast blame at those moms who allow the trend-worshipping impulses of People Magazine to contaminate the pool of children’s literature.
It is inaccurate to paint all moms with the same derisive brush. The woman who spoke with me oversimplified the problem for the sake of clarity. While mothers may drive the trend it should be noted that not all mothers drive it. Many moms are the librarians of their own homes and share the impulses of arch-librarian Lillian Smith who was fond of quoting Walter De La Mare’s assertion “… only the rarest kind of best in anything can be good enough for the young.” Also, it should be noted that Goodnight Moon, Make Way for Ducklings, and other classics are still in print and are found in places other than libraries. Furthermore, moms are also the drivers behind the homeschool movement, which frequently treasures the classics.
However, we must acknowledge that the value of timeliness is culturally assumed, but the value of timelessness must be culturally defended. Moms, if you’re concerned about the current trends in children’s literature, you might consider spending your dollar strategically and supporting publishers who share your values. Dads, maybe you should pick out a few books too.
Here are a few thoughts in defense of the classical impulse:
1. Classical books and stories aid in cultural literacy. We each live in a particular culture and navigate that culture with varying degrees of success. Classics lay bare the origins of many cultural phenomena. If a culture has no way to reference its foundational stories (i.e. King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table) except through satire (i.e. King Artie and the Underpants of the Changing Table), then that culture is bereft of gratitude. A culture bereft of gratitude is a culture committing suicide.
2. Classically biased books aim to cultivate a curiosity about the world, whereas contemporary books often seek to enhance self-regard. The “Kid’s Rule!” attitude of many kid’s books encourages a distasteful narcissism and a habit of immaturity. By immaturity I mean the preference for what is mine over what is right. Timeless books tend to assume the child’s experience is a universal human experience. There is nothing wrong with condescending to a child by simplifying one’s message, but it seems best when the child still has to aspire toward the meaning.
3. The classical triad of Truth, Goodness, and Beauty is more readily defended in timeless books. Timely books often substitute Usefulness, Sincerity, and Fashion. It’s a bad trade and leads to moral illiteracy. Morals mutate from truths to trends.
I should mention that I am an illustrator who prefers classic illustration to contemporary illustration, and some of the energy of this post might be the result of sour grapes. I recently had an editor tell me she loved my work but it seemed old-fashioned. It took me a minute to realize it was a criticism. At any rate, I welcome opposing thoughts, as I may be overlooking hidden virtues or benefits of timeliness.
You can find more of his work online at zachfranzen.com and on Instagram @zachfranzen.
- Be More Human - February 17, 2020
- Time for Timelessness - August 19, 2019
- Seven Steps To a Better Bedtime Story - November 7, 2018
This post hits me right where I hurt. So good. Thanks Zach.
Thank YOU! And take THAT!
Timeliness vs.Timelessness. Those two words say it all for anyone who has bemoaned the steady decline in literary depth of illustrated children’s books. I want you to illustrate my timeless children’s story (if I can only find the time to write it…irony noted).
Thanks Clay
This post reminds me of a conversation I had with a seminary professor about “praise music” (oh, that antiquated phrase) versus hymns. He mentioned that one of the reasons we see hymns as more timeless is because they’ve already gone through history’s winnowing fan. The inferior ones have been cast off, leaving behind only the good grain. Perhaps something similar will happen with much of today’s contemporary fiction.
Loren, I think that’s part of the tragedy. The transience of fashion is good for the publishing business, but bad for kids. I think some publishers bank on disposability as a tactic to create space in the market. The domination of short-term thinking is bad in most any field, but especially bad in publishing because kids actually digest the books (sometimes many) that are little more than mental cotton candy. Also, Publisher’s resources are limited, which means that in order to spend money editing, marketing, and publishing Modelland, they had to say no to some other book. I do, however, agree with your broader point that these books won’t be around long enough to cause perpetual damage.
Such an important conversation for both children’s lit and adult lit!
“I recently had an editor tell me she loved my work but it seemed
old-fashioned. It took me a minute to realize it was a criticism.” That gave me a good giggle. I’ve been there too…in realms other than illustration. Thanks for the thoughts and the jump-start reminder that I want to collect more classics for our kids.
Thank you! “A culture bereft of gratitude is a culture committing suicide.” This is why I’ve stocked our library with classics, and am trying to rid it of all “twaddle” (a Charlotte Mason word describing all those timely books that are filled with drivel and not very interesting to parents OR kids, really). I love the booklists at Ambelside Online for collections of classic, old-fashioned, timeless stories!
I was unfamiliar with the Ambelside site, but it looks like an amazing resource for parents. It is, of course, very important for parents and children to treasure the classics, but there is one point worth mentioning that I didn’t develop very much in the post. If publishers don’t nurture the timeless ideal in contemporary literature, then certain truths will seem trapped in the classics unable to escape to the present. Some readers already perceive about the assumptions in classic works as if they are exhibits in a museum–nice to visit, but not for taking home. It is good for old books to have new readers, but it is also good for old truths to have new books. It is heartening for a reader to perceive a continuity in the world from past to present and to know that the wild truths glimpsed in an older work are still roaming around today.
Great point, Zach. And one I’m certain my friend Allison would heartily agree with. It would be fun to do a post highlighting some modern books with these virtues. I would start with N.D. Wilson.
Yes, I think that’s a great start.
This is so good. I’m loving the opportunity of introducing my kids to timeless books (we just finished A Little Princess; talk about a contrast to the current onslaught of princesses!).
By the way, is the illustration in this post one of yours? It’s fascinating.
It is his, Loren. I love his illustrations. And I agree. great stuff from Zach as always! His other posts here all (so far) have featured original artwork. I love it.
Thanks Sam. Thanks Loren.
Zach, thanks for sharing your observations, along with a great distillation of what makes timeless literature so valuable. I’ll be pointing others to this article…
Thanks James.
Caution here – I appreciate there being a definition of timelessness and timeliness, but truly, the reader decides what is and isn’t timeless. Narnia is timeless but Lewis was considered contemporary and fresh (and even trite and commercial). To Kill a Mockingbird was a timely, searing contemporary work before it ascended into the classics. So was Treasure Island, Dickens, Les Miserables. If we try to sound like those books then it is an homage to their work, but that doesn’t make it a timeless piece—it may. But it won’t happen because we assert that through word choice, subject matter, classic illustrations.
Thanks for your thoughts, Kevin!
You make three points. 1. The reader is the judge of timeliness and timelessness. 2. Some books are both timeless and timely. 3. The power to declare something timeless is out of the creator’s hands.
I agree with your second point. There are timeless works that were timely when first published. Dickens’ Nicholas Nickelby and Arthur Miller’s The Crucible are other good additions to your list, though I don’t understand the inclusion of Treasure Island. The timely part of The Crucible, e.g. its connection to the McCarthy hearings, gets less interesting with every passing year, but John Proctor’s internal struggle over the worth of his integrity is perpetually evergreen.
Our disagreement centers on your first and third point. This is probably due to my failure to define “timelessness.” My phrase “classically biased” probably confuses things more.
The terms “classic” and “timeless” are related, but not interchangeable (though that is probably unclear from the post above). While practically all classics are timeless, not all timeless works are classics. “Classic” is a term of art and the product of consensus. Understandably you are using “timeless” as a substitute for “classic.” This substitution explains your first and third point. But I think “timeless” is a narrower term that describes the writer’s approach.
Timeless works anchor their substance to truths that are unchanging and universal.
Therefore, timelessness either factually exists in a work or does not. We can trace it if it does exist. It is not the creation of the audience, but the author. Consensus for all its savage strength does not have the power to make something absent that is factually present. And yet, there is no guarantee that a timeless book will be a classic.
Timelessness doesn’t have to do with trying to sound like old books. It is rather the pursuit of the universal unchanging perspective.
Edit: I believe that the classics are a good place to look for this perspective. Older books tend to view art as transcendent of culture, race, or nationality. Newer books tend to view art as prisoner of one’s culture, race, or nationality.
I adore old-fashioned illustrations!!! They are so magical, beautiful, and fairytale like.